Five copy frameworks fit landing pages well: AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action), PAS (Problem, Agitation, Solution), BAB (Before, After, Bridge), FAB (Features, Advantages, Benefits), and StoryBrand (positioning the visitor as hero). Each organizes copy around a different reader journey. None is best universally; each fits certain audiences and offers better than others.
The Five Frameworks
|
Framework |
Best fit |
|
AIDA |
Awareness-stage; broad audience |
|
PAS |
Pain-driven categories; B2B |
|
BAB |
Outcome-driven offers; SaaS |
|
FAB |
Product-heavy categories |
|
StoryBrand |
Brand-led; positioning matters |
Let's Build a Landing Page That Works
AIDA - Attention, Interest, Desire, Action
The classic. Headline gets attention; subhead and visual create interest; benefits and proof build desire; CTA drives action. Maps cleanly to landing page anatomy. Works well for awareness-stage offers and broad audiences.
PAS - Problem, Agitation, Solution
Name the problem; agitate (make the cost of the problem real); introduce the solution. Powerful for pain-driven categories - compliance, security, ops failures, anything where the visitor already feels the problem. Common in B2B.
BAB - Before, After, Bridge
Show the before state; show the after state; the product is the bridge. Works for transformation-oriented offers - SaaS that replaces a painful current state, services that change outcomes. Visual potential is high.
FAB - Features, Advantages, Benefits
Translate each feature into the advantage it creates and the benefit it delivers. Works for product-heavy categories where the feature set is the story. Risk: writing too much feature, too little benefit.
StoryBrand
Position the visitor as hero; the brand as guide. Reframes the page from "look at us" to "we get you, and here is the path." Works when brand and positioning matter; less natural for pure utility offers.
Which Framework When?
AIDA for broad TOFU offers; PAS for pain-led B2B; BAB for transformation SaaS; FAB for product-heavy categories; StoryBrand for brand-led marketing. Often hybrids work - PAS in the hero, FAB in the benefit sections, BAB in the proof block. The framework is a tool, not a religion. (See the anatomy of a high-converting landing page for the component map these frameworks fill, and how to match landing page message to ad copy for the upstream message-match layer.) Centric writes landing page copy through its landing pages service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which framework converts best?
Depends on audience and offer. PAS often wins for B2B pain categories; AIDA for broad TOFU; BAB for SaaS transformation. Test before assuming.
Can I combine frameworks?
Yes - often the best pages do. PAS in the hero + FAB in benefits + BAB in proof is a common hybrid.
Does StoryBrand work for B2B?
Yes, especially for considered B2B services. The "visitor as hero" framing resonates when buyers want a partner that gets their situation.
What is the most-misused framework?
FAB. Teams write three paragraphs of features and call it FAB - without doing the benefit translation. The benefit is the point; without it, FAB is just a spec sheet.
Conclusion
Copy frameworks are scaffolds - they organize a journey, not replace one. Pick the framework that fits the audience and offer; often hybridize. The discipline of working from a framework keeps pages from rambling, and rambling is one of the most common reasons landing page copy fails to drive action.
